amlıgent
For UK law firms, TCSPs, estate and letting agents

The complete AML file, prepared — not another checklist.

Identity, screening, source of funds and source of wealth: analysed, evidenced, and written up as a decision-ready assessment where every statement resolves to the document behind it. Your nominated officer reads it and countersigns. The judgement stays yours.

Amligent supports the decision.
The firm makes it.

Every assessment is a draft until your nominated officer adopts it. No setting removes that step.
Why this exists

The obligation is old. The evidence of failure is published.

Under the Money Laundering Regulations your firm must not only perform due diligence but be able to demonstrate it — and on inspection, that means producing a file that shows what was checked, what it showed, and why the conclusion follows.

13.5% of 833 firms the SRA rated in 2024–25 were assessed as fully compliant. Around a third were not compliant.
1 in 10 client files that required a source-of-funds check contained none at all.
£1.5m in fines issued over the same period, alongside 101 referrals for source-of-funds failures.

Figures from the Solicitors Regulation Authority's 2024–25 anti-money-laundering annual report and thematic review. They describe compliance ratings and file reviews at inspected firms; they are not a claim about firms generally.

What you receive

One signed package, per matter.

Not a dashboard of amber flags for someone to interpret. A finished assessment in a fixed twelve-section order, with the evidence base, the full check register, the rule library version that applied, the audit trail, and the countersign record — human-readable and machine-readable, signed so its integrity can be verified later.

Every material statement carries a citation. Click one and you see the bank line, the title record, the completion statement it rests on. A statement citing evidence that does not exist cannot reach your screen — the file stops itself before it reaches you.

Assessment — specimen matter Rule library v4.2 · Tier: standard · Analyst-reviewed

8 · Source of funds & source of wealth

Twenty-four months of statements were analysed EV-12. Salary credits are consistent with the declared gross and the stated employer.

A pension of £21,400 cannot itself explain a £75,000 gift, and the assessment does not treat the declared occupation as explaining it. The contributor's account shows a credit matching the completion statement for a property sale EV-31. The reconciliation therefore holds, but on the property sale rather than on income.

9 · Risk factors

SOF-0142 Third-party contribution — identified and resolved, not removed. Risk-reducing: RRF-0027 wholly domestic, no cash.

10 · Matters not assessed, blocked or unresolved

One credit of £9,400 explained but not evidenced. At 1.4% of consideration it is not required to explain the declared funding. A question you may wish to put…

Adopted by the firm's nominated officer · countersign recorded
How it works

Five minutes of your time at the start. One decision at the end.

01

You open the matter

Seven questions about the transaction and the parties. Invitations go out automatically — each person gets their own, with their own privacy notice. Contributors are contacted directly, never through your client.

02

We do the work

Your client completes a guided journey on their phone: no account, no password, no branch visit. Identity verification, screening, bank data by regulated connection. Chasing is automatic — nobody at your firm composes a reminder, and nobody has to ring to ask where things are.

03

Your officer countersigns

They read the draft, follow any citation to its evidence, record the firm's own risk categorisation, and adopt it — confirming a code from their authenticator so the signature is provably theirs. Or they send it back with a question.

Data, safeguards and the awkward questions

Built to be inspected, not just to look reassuring.

The questions your IT reviewer, your supervisor and your insurer will ask — answered here rather than after you have signed something.

Your client's data stays in the UK

Stored in London and processed in the UK, including the AI work. That is enforced technically at the cloud account level, not merely promised in a policy document.

We delete our copy

When you adopt the file, retention passes to you. We delete the evidence and the assessment, issue a deletion record, and keep only a hash manifest so a returning client's checks can be verified rather than repeated.

A human always decides

An analyst reviews every file before it reaches you, and your officer countersigns before it becomes your firm's assessment. No configuration removes either step — which is what makes the decision meaningfully human under the reformed automated-decision rules.

Nothing is presented as a verdict

You will never see "approved" or "cleared" from us. Indicators are presented with the evidence and the rule behind them; the conclusion is yours to draw, because in law it can only be yours.

Everything is recorded

An append-only, hash-chained trail of every document received, every model call, every human edit and decision — exportable in a form a supervisor can read.

Separation of duties, by default

Your fee-earners see the matters they are on. Only your nominated officer sees everything. Where you act for both sides, information barriers are enforced by the database, not by good intentions.

Talk to us

See it run on a matter of your own shape.

We will walk you through a specimen file end to end — the client journey, the assessment, the citations, the countersign — and answer the compliance questions properly. Priced per completed file. No seat licences, no minimum term.